Tuesday, January 15, 2008

Bad Canadian Churches


Like I have said before I rightfully do not show false partiality to anyone.


To : The Honourable Prime Minister of Canada Stephen Harper, Leader of the Conservative Party

Subject: The Evangelical churches in Canada - and the poor people in it too.

My more recent posts in more detail to you, provincial premiers, legislative members, members of parliament, the news media and even posted now next on the Internet are clearly about the false pastors, false Evangelical churches in Canada, and yes they are specifically the Evangelical ones, the Christian Missionary Alliance Church too, and the related bad evangelical, Pentecostal churches now too.

Beside too many of the pastors being too often sex maniacs, who commit adultery, wrongfully counsel divorce, one of the most unacceptable sins of these churches has been their switch and bait approach, actually collecting donations, the money under false pretenses, but not actually fully revealing where all the money even goes, and in the process robbing the poor people unacceptable as well.

This is how I rightfully still do see it, the federal government they should stop being hypocritical in their false selective church revenue reviews and review all the income of all of the professing Christians churches, all of the Evangelicals, and the Christian Missionary Alliance church, (C&MA) included. Which is related to the bad Pentecostal churches now too.

As you know I have given the whole world the opportunity to read the truth. I have plenty of time and will to pursue these matters even more too. And I can readily compete with your own very costly marketing groups now too as you know eh...

All these churches I detailed about in Canada claim to believe in, to preach, and practice the Bible as the world of God, but lyingly only. The do basically still steal from the poor people, poorer evangelical poor people. For in fact they do not give 1/7 of the tithe income to the local poor people as commandment by the same bible now too. Nor do they give the poor people in the evangelical churches their portions as designated by the new testament apostles now too. And these are all undeniable facts.

So what are you going to do good rightfully do about it now too? RSVP


http://groups.msn.com/AFOLLOWEROFCHRIST
http://groups.msn.com/AFOLLOWEROFCHRIST2
http://groups.msn.com/HolySpiritCome
http://pbulow.tripod.com
http://thenoncomformer.spaces.live.com/
http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday6
http://groups.msn.com/CanadaToday5
etc.,

Now It is not the ten commandments that most people, even the religious leaders do practice but rather it is the law of the jungle, the survival of the fittest, grab all you can here on earth and to Hell with everyone else.

- How to woo women's votes "The Calgary Sun Mon, January 14, 2008 Recent polling by the good people at Ipsos Reid has shown that support for Prime Minister Stephen Harper's Conservatives has a definite gender gap. Four polls late last year show that support for the federal Conservatives averages 42% among men, but only 33% among women. Pollsters are finding women aren't embracing the issues that are traditionally near and dear to conservatives. Men feel the economy and military defence are top issues -- good muscular issues that allow you to seriously discuss capital loss carryforwards and the relative merits of soft-skinned armour. For women, two of the top issues are the thoughtful and less testosterone-fuelled subjects of education and poverty. In addition, 28% of women think health care is a key issue, but only 18% of men do. I suppose men aren't as concerned about health care because they figure they have the women in their lives to look after them when they get a case of the sniffles. Women know that if they get sick, they're pretty much on their own. These of course are the big issues, and political witch doctors are advising Harper to do more to address issues traditionally important by women. He's probably been told having a photo on his prime minister's website of him reading to a kitten (I'm not making this up -- look for yourself) isn't going to fool anyone into thinking he's in touch with his feminine side. Women want to know where he stands on the real issues. For example, where does Harper stand on the issue of refilling ice cube trays? After education, the environment, health care and poverty, refilling the ice cube trays ranks fairly close to the top of the issues polls reveal are important to the woman in my life. A photo op of him putting a full ice cube tray back in the freezer would be good for at least a 5% bump in the polls -- 10% if he doesn't slop water all over the kitchen floor in the process. Where does our prime minister stand on making sure his socks and underwear actually go into the laundry basket and don't just end up on the carpet on his side of the bed? For that matter, the prime minister owes it to the Canadian people to make clear his position on leaving wet towels on the bathroom floor after a shower. The Conservative government may reject Kyoto as a national policy, but where does it stand on global warming inside 24 Sussex Drive? Nothing will make a man drop in the polls like keeping the thermostat in the house too low. If your spouse is forced to wear a sweater in the winter because the furnace is set too low, and in the summer because the air conditioning is set too high, don't expect to get a rise out of your approval rating, or anything else for that matter. On the culture side, the next budget should have a hefty increase in funding for the CBC, provided they use the money exclusively for more programs about disasters in decorating, wardrobe makeovers and shows about flipping real estate. That would almost be enough for the female voter in my house to consider switching parties. A fireside chat with Laureen, where she swears that Stephen always replaces the toilet paper roll, would probably be enough to rocket him into a majority. An admission that he doesn't roll his eyes when she comes home with two jumbo, 36-roll family packs she bought on sale is easily worth back-to-back majorities. Either that or the Conservatives could seriously address issues of real concern to women -- such as child care, elder care, social justice and access to opportunities." http://calsun.canoe.ca/News/Columnists/Lautens_Stephen/2008/01/14/4771607-sun.php

I can fully say that the federal new Conservative platform has been significantly shaped by the values of the (C&MA) itself, especially by the rich people in their Church who do wrongfully now despise the poor persons, even the poor Christian persons, and they do also steal from the poor now too, wrongfully ostrich the poor people.. but the (C&MA) are already known also in finding jobs for their friends which has always been in Canada a false (C&MA) agenda as well. The Christian and Missionary Alliance church, is was strongly allied to the “higher life” , meaning that they are selfishly so heavenly minded that they still tend not to be of any personal earthly good.. and wrongfully they have excluded helping the poor persons in their main doctrines. The poor people tend to be women and the children more often. Even in reference to their many historical preacher's writings the references to the poor generally are not mentioned, non existent, rare.. and yet the Bible, the New Testament contains tones of references to the subject still too. The main platform of the (C&MA)Jesus as savior, healer, sanctifier, coming king now wrongfully excludes this need to help the poor now too. The (C&MA) is a self made, self centered, unacceptably mostly a male dominated bastion now too http://www.cmalliance.org/whoweare/doctrine.jsp

- The Canadian Liberals new platform on helping the poor people, feminines versus the new Conservative

The Canadian federal Liberals new platform on helping the poor people was certainly not the platform of the now ex Liberal PMs Jean Chretien, or Paul Martin who clearly were mainly interested in helping themselves and their friends. So why did it take them so long to indulge now in this real need of helping the poor people in Canada the last 50 years now too? The two latest Liberal spokesmen, Trudeau and Dryden, for poverty to me have no real credibility on the subject too.. Get real!!

There is no such thing still as a little bit pregnant and any significant deviation expounded can next mostly lead to great deviations, errors too.

Believe it or not my having been both an adherent of the very local Christian Missionary Alliance church, (C&MA)for about 8 years, and my having attended, me having got to know personally also the senior pastor of the Calgary First alliance church too, I can fully say that the Conservative platform has been significantly shaped by the values of the CMA itself, esspecially their rich persons who wrongly despise the poor persons, and they do also steal from the poor now too, and wrongfully negelect, ostrich the poor people.. but (C&MA) are already known also in falsely finding jobs solely for their friends which has always been in Canada a false (C&MA) agenda as well..

Helping the poor people seems to have been left mainly to the Catholic church it seems.. Anyone who thinks that the Sally Ann realy helpa the poor and not themselves too should vist their kinky stores where they sell things for profit firstly.

The Christian and Missionary Alliance (C&MA) is an Evangelical Protestant denomination within Christianity. The Christian Missionary Alliance for the most part. is very similar to Baptist with Wesleyan mix. They are Trinitarian They are classed among the "conservative Protestant" churches. "Founded by Rev. Albert Benjamin Simpson in 1887, the Christian & Missionary Alliance did not start off as a denomination, but rather began as two distinct parachurch organizations: The Christian Alliance which focused on the pursuit and promotion of the Higher Christian life and The Evangelical Missionary Alliance, which focused on mobilizing "consecrated" Christians in the work of foreign missionary efforts. These two groups amalgamated in 1897 to form The Christian and Missionary Alliance. It was only much later during the mid twentieth century that an official denomination was formed." The Christian and Missionary Alliance church, is was strongly allied to the “higher life” , meaning that they are selfishly so heavenly minded that they still tend not to be of any personal earthly good.. and they have wrongfully excluded helping poor persons in their main doctrines. http://www.cmalliance.org/whoweare/doctrine.jsp

Note this undeniably too - The original Apostles had clearly stated that money was to be weekly collected in the local church for the poor people, but historical the Evangelicals next distorted this commandment to mean that this money should be used rather for missionary work, and church empire building, not biblical still too, but the (C&MA) clearly next expounded on this that this also that money should go specially to the support of all of their Christian workers, pastors, too many of whom do try and like to live well off too.. in accordance to the (C&MA) as far as the poor they can help themselves on their own and not on any of the money from the (C&MA)church.. nor are the really welcomed to come to the (C&MA)church now too. sad but true. The clearly established biblical requirement of giving of 1/7 of all the tithe income collected to the local poor has also never been carried out. And as you can see ehe PM Stephen Harper is really not much different from the views of the (C&MA). It is also historical fact that the greatest theologians of the CMA A B Simpson a " Political libertarian with ties to the Christian Right. ... (1843 - 1919) - preacher, writer, and founder of The Christian and Missionary Alliance (C&MA) " included, or Dr. Andrew Bonar, A. W. Tozer (1897-1963), even in reference to their many writings the references to the poor generally are not mentioned, non existent, rare.. and yet the Bible, the New testament contains tones of references to the subject still too. The main platform of the (C&MA)Jesus as savior, healer, sanctifier, coming king now wrongfully excludes this need to help the poor now too. The (C&MA) is a self made, self centered, mostly a male dominated bastion now too

"During the beginning of the twentieth century, Simpson became closely involved with the growing Pentecostal movement, an offshoot of the Holiness movement. It became common for Pentecostal pastors and missionaries to receive their training at the Missionary Training Institute that Simpson founded. Consequently, Simpson and the C&MA had a great influence on Pentecostalism, in particular the Assemblies of God and the International Church of the Foursquare Gospel. This influence included evangelical emphasis, C&MA doctrine, Simpson's hymns and books, and the use of the term 'Gospel Tabernacle,' which led to many Pentecostal churches being known as 'Full Gospel Tabernacles.After Simpson's death in 1919, the C&MA distanced itself from Pentecostalism, rejecting the premise that speaking in tongues necessarily indicates being filled with the Holy Spirit, '" The Pentecostal Assemblies of Canada churches a historical direct break away from the Christian and Missionary Alliance (C&MA) wrongfully also tends to despise the poor persons as well. Does the Toronto airport Christian fellowship church also not really are about helping poor people wrongfully too?

The Christian Missionary Alliance church tends to operates in a dictatorial, pyramid structure, and not in the rightfuly New testament plurality of elders, congressional approach. All acys, doctrines are also determined from central point like Roman Catholic faith:" "The General Assembly," [world headquarters] "is the ultimate authority under God of The Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada." (The Manual, Ordination of ministers section, Christian Missionary Alliance church) Understanding the dictatorial approach of the Christian Missionary Alliance church is related also now to their claiming direct Heavenly, godly inspiration to all truths by their leaders.The infallibility of the Pope doctrine too. It also destructive to truth, because individuals in the Christian Missionary Alliance church conclude that all of their faith and doctrine is, must be without error, because the Holy Spirit directly taught it to them. This is also known as the error of "irresistible grace", one of the tenets of Calvinism. It is false doctrine. So is this Church. "The Christian Missionary Alliance church is one of the few remaining churches that actually believe in the word for word inspiration of the Bible and that it is error free and as they say in article #4: is "the divine and only rule of Christian faith and practice" (Christian Missionary Alliance Statement of Faith, Article 4). We applaud this rare quality of believing in error free inspiration of the Bible. However the big problem is that what they say and what they do are two different things. Their members, ministers churches and seminaries are required to "pledge allegiance" to the Alliance Creed (Statement of Faith). This means that the creed has precedence over the Bible itself and actually competes with the Bible as a sole standard of authority. As you will plainly see, the Bible is NOT the sole standard of faith, but a human origin creed is." " Members required to adhere to creed:"Qualifications for Local Church Membership: (1) A credible testimony of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. (2) A commitment to the principles expressed in the Statement of Faith of The Christian and Missionary Alliance." (The Manual, Christian Missionary Alliance church) Ministers required to adhere to creed even where it contradicts the Bible:Ordination of ministers: "Only a person who is in genuine agreement with the doctrines and teachings of The Christian and Missionary Alliance, may be approved by The Christian and Missionary Alliance as a minister of the Gospel." (The Manual, Christian Missionary Alliance church) "A candidate shall state on the provided forms, knowledge of Bible doctrine and acceptance of doctrinal distinctives of The Christian and Missionary Alliance. Willingness to accept the constituted authority of The Christian and Missionary Alliance must also be expressed." (The Manual, Ordination of ministers section, Christian Missionary Alliance church) Ministers fired if they deviate from church creed even if they learn it teaches things that contradict the Bible:" Expulsion: Where the accused minister has been found guilty of teaching doctrines contrary to the Statement of Faith." (The Manual, Ordination of ministers section, Christian Missionary Alliance church) Seminaries that ordain ministers are controlled by Headquarters who demand the creed be followed even if it teaches false doctrine:"The doctrinal statement of The Christian and Missionary Alliance in Canada, as found in the General Constitution, will be binding on the colleges and/or seminaries." (The Manual, Ordination of ministers section, Christian Missionary Alliance church) Local church assets will be seized if they don’t follow the creed:"This church operates in accordance with its Statement of Faith. Should this church cease to be subject to the doctrines and teachings of The Christian and Missionary Alliance, all of its property shall become the property of the district corporation." (The Manual, Ordination of ministers section, Christian Missionary Alliance church) . "Their creed on how a sinner should be saved is both incomplete and false. "those who repent and believe in Him are born again" (Christian Missionary Alliance Statement of Faith, Article 6) Personally Repent, Belive, accept jesus Christ as your lord and be baptized is what the new testament actually says, commands..The "Articles of Faith" quoted are copyright of the Christian Missionary Alliance church and based upon the General Councils 1965, 1966, 1974, 1995. The "Manual", Christian Missionary Alliance church is copyright of the Christian Missionary Alliance church.

" One of the snares in Assembly Of God and Christian Missionary Alliance and other denominations is the REVERSION CLAUSE. It is one of the main lynch pins which holds the power of the elite together at the expense of the local church. It should really be called the perversion clause, because it is a license to steal, giving power and authority to the headquarters of these denominations which it should not have in the first place. It gets further compounded (and builds even more absolute power to the elite) when tithing pledges and building fund pledges and covenants snare the members into even more bondage. If a local Church decides it does not want to be C&MA or AOG anymore for promoting false teachers...the reversion clause give the hdqrs absolute sovereignty over the local church, rendering any local sovereignty statements null and void. The reversion clause is nothing more than entitlement syndrome to the C&MA (or AOG) clamoring for something it did not pay for...it is the old Henny Penny Parable whose moral (immoral) theme is: “You do all of the work on the farm and I will take the fruit of all your labors...all of the harvest!” This reminds me of the collective farms in the Soviet Union in which the citizens owned nothing, only the State owned property. But in this case it would be the national C&MA church that owns your property. The reversion clause was originally designed to keep wayward pastors and maverick churches from straying from sound Biblical doctrine and denomination policies and supposed safeguard its members. But it does not protect the local congregation when the national leadership and hierarchy go apostate, rendering the clause a very convenient, but unilateral. Local churches also do make percentage of income payments to the hdqrs and/or send part of tithes and offerings to the headquarters, the reversion clause, it still gives them what is tantamount to a license to steal! " http://www.abrahamic-faith.com/James/ReversionClauseCMA&AOG.pdf

Prominent bad former (C&MA) members- Interesting

Charles Templeton, post-war evangelist. Subsequently left and became an agnostic.
David Berg (deceased), who left to found the cult the Children of God, now known as The Family International

The Liberals thmselves are in direct Biblical errors, even do now oppose the Catholic church by supporting abortions, women instituted divorce, and allowing the gays and lesbians now too.

PS: It is also interesting to note the ties between the Church of the Nazarene and the Christian and Missionary Alliance. '" Ambrose University College (AUC) is a private Christian liberal arts college located in Calgary, Alberta. It is the official Canadian school of both the Church of the Nazarene and the Christian and Missionary Alliance. It is one of 10 colleges and universities affiliated with the Church of the Nazarene in North America and one of 8 colleges and universities affiliated with the Christian and Missionary Alliance.[citation needed] In terms of its affiliation with the Nazarene church, AUC (formerly Canadian Nazarene University College) is the college for the Canada Region.[1]Ambrose University College is the product of similar educational journeys begun in the first half of the twentieth century.[2]

The Calgary Bible Institute was first established in 1921 in the basement of the Calgary First Church of the Nazarene. In 1927, the school relocated to Red Deer, where it became known as Alberta School of Evangelism, and then Northern Bible College (NBC) with the construction of a new campus. In 1940, it was renamed again as Canadian Nazarene College (CNC) as it began offering theology degrees. In 1960, CNC moved to Winnipeg and was established as the official Canadian university college for the Church of the Nazarene.

Similarly but independently, the Canadian Bible Institute was founded in 1941. In 1949, it was recognized by Saskatchewan and renamed Western Canadian Bible Institute (WCBI). It was renamed again in 1957 as the Canadian Bible College (CBC) of the Christian and Missionary Alliance (C&MA) and, in the 1960s, became associated with the University of Regina. Canadian Theological College (CTC) was established in 1970 as a graduate sister school to CBC, and was renamed Canadian Theological Seminary (CTS) in 1982.

Dr. Riley Coulter, President of CNC, determined that Manitoba would not accredit private institutions of higher education in the liberal arts and sciences. CNC thus moved back to its first home, Calgary, in 1995, became an accredited university college in 1999, and changed its name to Nazarene University College (NUC). Dr. George Durance, President of CBC/CTS, came to similar realizations regarding the accreditation status of his school in Saskatchewan and, in 2000, CBC/CTS made a similar decision. In 2003, CBC/CTS officially relocated to join NUC on the same campus, received accreditation in 2004, and changed its name to Alliance University College (AUC). AUC and NUC maintained a close relationship and were often referred to as Alliance University College-Nazarene University College (AUC-NUC), though the two granted degrees independently until 2007.

In 2007 Alliance University College and Nazarene University College became a single entity, known as Ambrose University College, in honour of Ambrose.[3] Ambrose is building a new campus in west Calgary. The project began in April 2007 and the new campus is expected be ready in September 2008 "

"For all intents and purposes, the basic doctrines of the Alliance and Nazarene denominations are identical. Their central doctrine of "entire sanctification" is based upon John Wesley's "Christian Perfection"--a "perfection" that is adjusted down to a level they feel can be attained. This ploy is characteristic of all "holiness," experience-centered movements." http://withchrist.org/MJS/cma.htm

The Department of National Defence of all things needs to rewrite their page http://www.dnd.ca/hr/religions/engraph/religions07_e.asp about the Christian and Missionary Alliance chruch in Canada

In theory "The Christian and Missionary Alliance opposes marriage of members to non-Christians. The Church opposes divorce except in cases of adultery and cases where a non-Christian spouse leaves the marriage. Remarriage is permissible for members formerly married to non-Christians and for the aggrieved spouses in cases of divorce on the grounds of adultery." Alliance pastors have wrongfully been known to wrongfully break up marriages at their own whims when they designate one person as a non believer (Or supposedly insane).

I have personaly witnessed 2 Alliance (C&MA) pastors being guilty of this in Canada of the Calgary First Alliance Church, and you do not think they got away with it too? Their unacceptable sins are posted for all to read..

Living 15 years in Calgary Alberta has let me to concluded that some of the biggest human rights violators are even the professing Calgary Christians evangelicals and Catholics now included who as ostriches do deny others the right to be heard, to speak as well..

Also the people who like to make and/ or to enforce rules, relgious persons and even the cops, lawyers, judges now included, they too often do not keep them themselves.. The Evangelicals and their pastors especially it seems, sadly most evangelicals are known not only to be intolerant of others, do tend to deny them the right to speak and to be heard, but they also tend to fail to practice firstly what they like to preach to the others. Truly Lip service Christianity is what the Evangelicals tend to be best at in Calgary too.

I WOULD RIGHTFULLY SEE THEM PRACTICE CHRISTIANITY THAN BE ANOTHER HYPOCRITE WHO MERELY PREACHES IT AND WRONGFULLY ASKS FOR MONEY FOR DOING SO AS WELL..

A more accurate estimate was, is that 15 percent of the catholic priests in North America have been gays, and at least 55 percent of evangelical pastors have committed adultery, have been divorced or counseled divorce? So what group is now more spiritual the 20 percent gay Catholics priests or the 55 percent Protestant adulterous pastors? So how come no one loudly protests about the high amount of Adulterous pastors? Kinda of hypocritical is it not? or sexist?

"Men feel the economy and military defense are top issues" -- and the women tend to be more spiritually, church inclined.. and thus tend to significantly live longer over men too,.

The Department of National Defence of all things needs to rewrite their page http://www.dnd.ca/hr/religions/engraph/religions07_e.asp about the Christian and Missionary Alliance chruch in Canada

but firstly what is the Canadian federal department of defense doing having even now an interent page on religion, churches? RSVP